TK's staging site

Tuesday news

By tk
Tuesday, April 15, 2003

*'Mr. Yorktown' honored for service
-Charleston Post and Courier, 4-15-03

*The National Park Service is finishing a $250,000 repair job to ensure that the preserved ruin of Fort Sumter
-Charleston Post and Courier, 4-14-03

*Washers give Hunting Island Lighthouse a bath
-Beaufort Gazette, 4-15-03

*See a manatee?
-Savannah Morning News, 4-15-03

*Ministries share blessing of surf
-Florida Times Union, 4-15-03

*Indian River Lagoon system a bull shark nursery
*Daytona ready to act on Boardwalk proposal
-Daytona News Journal, 4-15-03

*Santa Rosa touts area for fall tourism
-Pensacola news Journal, 4-15-03


In date order the articles are:

1. The Early Dutch Explorers.

2. Loss of the Trial on the Australian Coast. not strictly an exploration one but I think it sits here as it was wrecked in Australian waters.

3. Captain James Cook Endeavour Journal.

4. The Charting of Australia Matthew Flinders.

5. The Discovery of Port Phillip Bay Victoria. Australia, and its early settlement.

 

I guess the gap in the Early Explorers of Australia are the French. I did actually start some time ago looking at them, names like Nicolas Baudin, Bouganville, La Perouse, and Antoine Raymond Joseph de Bruni D'Entrecasteaux. I had a first page done, then as often happens with me off I went on another tack, you have alerted me to the need to revisit those French navigators, thanks. But I guess it all measures up to extra work for you in due course Terry! Good luck with your tax return but I think you are at the absolute deadline for that, or so I read somewhere today on the net. Don't be late now. All the best,


>TK,
>
>Here goes to try and sort out the confusion.
>
>there are 3 separate sites.
>
>1. Dutch Submarine Hr Ms Potvis.

Under Links:
A site about a Submarine ........ should read:

A site about a Dutch Submarine. Hr Ms Potvis 804.
http://www.hrmspotvis.com/

2. http://www.ubootwaffe.net

is OK, but the last message  ( the one that follows Kind
regards Howard
Cook Vic. )

does not belong here and should be deleted.

3. Dutch Submarines of the Royal Netherlands Navy 1906 -
2003.

http://www.dutchsubmarines.com         Please add a link
to this site.

The messages in order from Bram are:

Terry I will forward them separately and head them Bram 1,
2, 3 . etc.

**********************

Mac.

Ahoy Mac,

A friend of mine just told me about your weblog. Its very good, packed with info, just how I love it, my compliments. I read afew article and bookmarked the site since a web
log should be visited frequently.

Of course I also added your log to the links page of my own site.

I did miss detailed info on the Dutch sub force in the article "Submarine Fleets over the 1939-1945 War"  ;-)

Greetings from Holland
Bram

Dutch Submarines: The Submarine of the Royal Netherlands Navy 1906-2003 http://www.dutchsubmarines.com

Hello Bram,

Thank you for E-Mail and your kind comments, I supply the content, but my friend Terry in Atlanta Georgia must take all the credit for the layout of Ahoy, and keeping it up to date, he runs all the difficult part in maintaining an up to date site.

We are always pleased to be linked to from another site interested in >Submarines, and will add a link to your site.

You are right, I have nothing about the Dutch Submarine service in WW2, other than a casual reference to them in the Pacific war. I must study your content, then, with your approval I will use some of  your details to remedy that situation.

Thanks again, and with kind regards,
Mac. Gregory.

Mac.

You two are a great team. >The look&feel + contents is outstanding !

I have created a button in my browser so I can easily check your log for updates.
>
> >> he runs all the difficult part in maintaining an up to date site.
> >>
> >> We are always pleased to be linked to from another site interested in Submarines, and will add a link to your site.
>
>Thanks Gregory

>
> >> You are right, I have nothing about the Dutch Submarine service in WW2, other than a casual reference to them in the Pacific war. I must study your content, then, with your approval
>
>Of course that is ok. As long as you mention the source.
>
> > I will use some of your details to remedy that situation.
>
>Many Dutch subs were based in Australia (Fremantle/Perth/Darwin). The RAN even took over a submarine from our Navy, the  K IX. Only got one Q, what is that tune on your site ? Its nice but very sad :-(

Have a good Sunday Gregory

Greetings from The Hague
Bram.


Ahoy Mac,

I saw the article the other day. Very nice.

Be aware that the one beforelast name is spelled incorrectly. It should be 'Tijgerhaai', and not 'Tigjerhaai'  There are several other memorial (also two more in Australia) on the Dutch Subs:

http://www.dutchsubmarines.com/men/men_memorials.htm

I also read the article on the Dutch explorers on the Aussie coast. Now I know where to send my colleges when they tell me again that Cook discovered Australia :-))

Did you know in Holland we built a replica by hand (using old methods and tools) of the Batavia ? More info (english) at

http://www.bataviawerf.nl/en/index.html

Lots of young pople that are on the brink of going in the wrong direction worked on the
project and learned a profession that way.

Currently they are building the '7 provindcien' at the same yard.

Greetings from Holland
Bram

Dutch Submarines: The Submarine of the Royal Netherlands Navy 1906-2003 http://www.dutchsubmarines.com

*************************

Bram has just informed me that on the Submarine plaque the
second last name
of the Dutch Subs is wrongly spelt.

It should be Tijgerhaai, and not Tigjerhaai.

Could you please add a note under the plaque pointing this
out?

Thanks, I will forward Bram's latest note.

 

Home