TK's staging site |
By *Folly's fortunes shift with sands: Planned renourishment project brings old issues to surface *Strand Plans: Visitors discuss The Boardwalk's future Story last updated at 8:38 a.m. Saturday, November 22, 2003 Why sub sank still baffles scientists BY SCHUYLER KROPF Of The Post and Courier Staff What's left when a sunken submarine is finally cleared of tons of pudding-like mud, the bones of eight men and a collection of 3,000 artifacts? A still unsolved mystery. Three years after it was raised off Sullivan's Island, archaeologists continue to be baffled as to what caused the Confederate submarine H.L. Hunley to sink.
With the goo finally out, the Hunley team is ready to start the next phase: mapping and X-raying its insides, removing its internal mechanisms and trying to figure out what catastrophe befell the sub in its final moments nearly 140 years ago. Although there are several theories, Hunley project manager Bob Neyland said the final answer probably won't come until all the critical data can be analyzed at once, years from now. "A lot of things don't come together until you start writing up all the evidence," Neyland said, adding that there "is no smoking gun." The X-ray of the sub is important because it will allow the scientists to see through all the levels of concretion covering both the sub's hull and its internal mechanics that may be covering up a defect that could have contributed -- even in a small, now undetectable way -- to the sinking. As in previous digs in the sub, several new secrets about the Hunley and her crew were found in the past few weeks: -- A repair kit to plug leaks. What was first thought to be a wooden chamber pot for the crew instead appears to be a caulking kit. It was aboard possibly in anticipation of the blast from ramming its 90-pound explosive into the Union blockade ship Housatonic. A chisel-shaped caulking iron was found nearby. A wrench, hammer and coil of rope were also found. -- Ballast water could be moved from front to back. A pipe under the crew's feet allowed sea water to be moved back and forth between the fore and aft ballast tanks. The advantage? It meant the crew didn't have to exhaust themselves by pumping in more ballast water. Instead, they could manage the minimal amount they needed to dive, surface or keep the sub on an even keel. Archaeologists were able to get into the ballast tanks by removing outside hull panels. -- Submarine integrity. None of the several large holes found in the sub appear to be from the time of the sinking but probably were a result of anchors being dragged over the sub afterward. The forward hatch is also slightly open and not fastened. Neyland said it may be because an anchor snagged it and forced it ajar. Sub commander George Dixon may also have left it open intentionally to act as a vent or to peer out. With no obvious sign of disaster "we have to look for more subtle influences as to the reason for the sinking," Neyland said. What is known for sure is that all eight crewmen died in their places in the sub: Dixon in front, and seven men behind him at working or rowing stations along the Hunley's internal propeller crank. The Hunley became the world's first successful attack submarine on the night of Feb. 17, 1864, when it rammed its black powder charge into the Housatonic, sending the Yankee ship to the bottom in a powerful explosion. Although the sub is believed to have survived the attack, it never returned. It was found four miles offshore by a dive team funded by best-selling author Clive Cussler in 1995 and raised in 2000. Most of the sub's innards -- including its crankshaft, crew bench seat, pumps, ballast ingots of various sizes and its depth gauge -- will also have to come out, Neyland said, so they can be conserved separately. Conservation work has already begun on many of the other artifacts already found, including bones, buttons, Dixon's gold watch and the diamond jewelry he carried.
Hello, Mac got some Navy questions for you, hope you can help, thanks. My name is Chad, from Texas. You see I am researching the Twelve Tribes of Israel, and all points that the Austrians are the Tribe of If you can tell of any more info. on the History of the Once Great Austian Navy. Your site has been a Christian regards, Chad from Texas
Nice to hear from you, I am afraid you flatter me when talking about Naval History. I have only been able to find two books that relate to the Austrian Navy, and should hasten to add I have not seen a copy of either one. They are: Sokol, Anthony, The Imperial and Royal Austro-Hungarian Navy, Naval Institute Press, Annapolis 1968. This covers the story of the Austrian Navy from its earliest days to WW1. and: Sondhaus, Lawrence, The Hapsburg Empire and the Sea. Austrian Naval Policy. 1797-1866, West Lafayette. Ind. Purdue University Press. 1989. As both books were published in your country, you may be able to find copies. When it comes to the Twelve Tribes of Israel,I am absolutely no use to you Chad. You have an unusual and interesting topic to be researching. There can be no doubt the early Austrian Navy was in the forefront of weapons development, and they were out there navigating round the world. I trust I may have been a little help, start with the NIP at Annapolis, they publish a lot of Naval History, but as the book in question was published back in 1968, it may be out of print. Good luck, Regards from Australia.
|